INDIAN PENAL CODE
Section 109: Punishment Of
Abetment If The Act Abetted Is Committed In Consequence And Where No Express
Provision Is Made For Its Punishment
109: Punishment Of Abetment
If The Act Abetted Is Committed In Consequence And Where No Express Provision
Is Made For Its Punishment::--Whoever abets any
offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment,
and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such
abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence.
Explanation: An act
or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment, when it is
committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy,
or with the aid which constitutes the abetment.
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE
Punishment—Same
as for offence abetted—According as offence abetted is cognizable or
non-cognizable—According as offence abetted is bailable or non-bailable—Triable
by court by which offence abetted is triable—Non-compoundable.
Illustrations
(a) A offers a bribe
to B, a public Servant, as a reward for showing A some favour in the exercise
of B’s official functions. B accepts the bribe. A has abetted the offence
defined in section 161.
(b) A instigates B
to give false evidence. B, in consequence of the instigation, commits that
offence. A is guilty of abetting that offence, and is liable to the same
punishment as B.
(c) A and B conspire
to poison Z. A, in pursuance of the conspiracy, procures the poison and
delivers it to B in order that he may administer it to Z. B, in pursuance of
the conspiracy, administers poison to Z in A’s absence and thereby causes Z’s
death. Here B is guilty of murder. A is guilty of abetting that offence by
conspiracy, and is liable to the punishment for murder.
No comments:
Post a Comment