Sunday, 27 January 2013

section 99 indian penal code


INDIAN PENAL CODE


Section 99: Act Against Which There Is No Right To Private Defence
99: Act Against Which There Is No Right To Private Defence::--There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act may not be strictly justifiable by law.
There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law.
There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.
Extent to which the right may be exercised–The right of private defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose of defence.
Explanation 1: A person is not deprived of the right or private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant, as such, unless he knows or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is such public servant.
Explanation 2: A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant, unless he knows, or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is acting by such direction, or unless such person states the authority under which he acts, or if he has authority in writing, unless he produces such authority, if demanded.

COMMENTS
Limitation within which the right of private defence be exercised is mentioned in s. 98.
It applies when a public servant is acting in good faith under the shield of his office, though the particular act may not be justified by law.The public servant should not act outside the scope of his powers.He may act irregularly–(1958) 61 Bom LR 30.
The right cannot be lawfully exercised when there is time to have recourse to the protection of public authorities. The third clause while exercising the right of private defence, one should not inflict, more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose of defence. The amount of force used and injury inflicted actually depends on the circumstances of each case.

No comments:

Post a Comment