INDIAN PENAL CODE
11: “Person”::--The word “person”
includes any Company or Association or body of persons, whether incorporated or
not.
COMMENTS
It may seem prima
facie that a corporate body or a body unincorporated person is punishable as an
ordinary individual.
According to s.
3(42) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, “person” shall include any company or
association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not;
A corporate body or
a company shall not be indictable for offences which can be committed only by a
human individual (e.g., rape, bigamy etc.) or for offences which must be
punished by imprisonment (e.g. cheating).–State of Maharashtra v. Syndicate
Bank AIR 1964 Bom 95:
In general, a
corporation is in the same position in relation to criminal liability as a
natural person and may be convicted of common law and statutory offences
including those requiring mens rea. There are, however, crimes which a
corporation is incapable of committing or of which a corporation cannot be
found guilty as principal; nor can a corporation be convicted of a crime for
which death or imprisonment are the only punishments.
Criminal liability of
a corporation arises where an offence is committed in the course of
corporation’s business by a person in control of its affairs to such a degree
that it may fairly be said to think and act through him so that his actions and
intent are the actions and intent of the corporation.
`Person’ includes–
(i) an individual,
(ii) a Hindu
undivided family,
(iii) a company,
(iv) a firm,
(v) an association
of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not,
(vi) a local
authority, and
(vii) every artificial
juridical person, not falling within any of the preceding
sub-clauses–Income-tax Act 1961, s. 2(31)
In Order 30, Rule
10, Code of Civil Procedure 1908, the word `person’ does not include a company,
because such a construction will be repugnant to the context–Modi Vanaspati v.
Khaitan Jute Mills AIR 1969 Cal 496
A firm, an
individual or a group of individuals may be a person under s. 2(9) of the
Income-tax Act, 1922.–Ipoh v. Commissioner of Income-tax (1968)1 SCR 68: AIR
1968 SC 317

No comments:
Post a Comment