INDIAN PENAL CODE
Section 28:
“Counterfeit”::--A person is said to
“counterfeit” who causes one thing to resemble another thing, intending by
means of that resemblance to practice deception, or knowing it to be likely
that deception will thereby be practiced.
Explanation 11
: It is not essential to counterfeiting that the imitation should be exact.
Explanation 2 : When
a person causes one thing to resemble another thing, and the resemblance is
such that a person might be deceived thereby, it shall be presumed, until the
contrary is proved, that the person so causing the one thing to resemble the
other thing intended by means of that resemblance to practice deception or knew
it to be likely that deception would thereby be practised.
COMMENTS
Counterfeiting
generally implies exact imitation, with a view to deceive or defraud, by
passing the copy or thing forged for that which is original or genuine. But for
the purposes of this Code, there can be counterfeiting even though the
imitation is not exact and there are differences in detail “between the
original and the imitation so long as the resemblance is so close that
deception may thereby be practised.–” State of U.P. v. AIR 1960 SC 669.Most
commonly applied to the fraudulent and criminal imitation of money or
securities. In this Code it occurs in offences relating to coin provided in
Chapter XII and offences relating to property marks and currency notes in
Chapter XVIII.”
1.
Subs. by Act
1 of 1889, sec. 9, for the original Explanation.
No comments:
Post a Comment