INDIAN PENAL CODE
92: Act Done In Good Faith
For Benefit Of A Person Without Consent:--Nothing is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause to
a person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, even without that person’s
consent, if the circumstances are such that it is impossible for that person to
signify consent, or if that person is incapable of giving consent, and has no
guardian or other person in lawful charge of him from whom it is possible to
obtain consent in time for the thing to be done with benefit:
PROVIDED
First–That this
exception shall not extend to the intentional causing of death, or to the
attempting to cause death;
Secondly–That this
exception shall no extend to the doing of anything which the person doing it
knows to be likely to cause death, for any purpose other than the preventing of
death or grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous disease or infirmity;
Thirdly–That this
exception shall not extend tothe voluntary causing of hurt, or to the
attempting to cause hurt, for any purpose other than preventing of death or
hurt;
Fourthly–That this
exception shall not extend to the abetment of any offence, to the committing of
which offence it would not extend.
Illustrations
(a)Z is thrown from
his horse, and is insensible. A, a surgeon, finds that Z requires to be
trepanned. A, not intending Z’s death but in good faith, for Z’s benefit,
performs the trepan before Z recovers his power of judging for himself. A has
committed no offence.
(b)Z is carried of
by a tiger. A fires at the tiger knowing it to be likely that the shot may kill
Z, but not intending to kill Z, and in good faith intending Z’s benefit. A’s
ball give Z a mortal wound. A has committed no offence;
(c) A, a surgeon,
sees a child suffer an accident which is likely to prove fatal unless an
operation be immediately performed. There is no time to apply to the child’s
guardian. A performs the operation in spite of the entreaties of the child,
intending of good faith, the child’s benefit. A has committed no offence.
(d) A is in a house
which is on fire, with Z, a child. People below hold out a blanket. A drops the
child from the house top, knowing it to be likely that the fall may kill the
child, but not intending to kill the child, and intending in good faith, the
child’s benefit. Here, even if the child is killed by the fall, A has committed
no offence.
Explanation: Mere pecuniary
benefit is not benefit within the meaning of sections 88, 89 and 92.
No comments:
Post a Comment